<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
  <journal_metadata lang="en">
    <full_title>Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical
    Society</full_title>
    <abbrev_title>Bull. Austral. Math. Soc.</abbrev_title>
    <issn media_type="online">0004-9727</issn>
    <coden>ALNBAB</coden>
  </journal_metadata>
  <journal_issue>
    <publication_date media_type="online">
      <year>2005</year>
    </publication_date>
    <journal_volume>
      <volume>72</volume>
    </journal_volume>
    <issue>3</issue>
    <doi_data>
      <doi>10.wxyz/CV72P3</doi>
      <resource>
      http://www.austms.org.au/Publ/Bulletin/V72P3/</resource>
    </doi_data>
  </journal_issue>
  <journal_article publication_type="full_text">
    <titles>
      <title>There are no $n$-point $F_σ$ sets in $R^m$</title>
    </titles>
    <contributors>
      <person_name sequence="first" contributor_role="author">David
      L. Fearnley</person_name>
      <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
      L. Fearnley</person_name>
      <person_name sequence="additional" contributor_role="author">
      J.W. Lamoreaux</person_name>
    </contributors>
    <publication_date media_type="online">
      <given_date>13 February 2006</given_date>
      <year>2006</year>
      <month>2</month>
      <day>13</day>
    </publication_date>
    <pages>
      <first_page>477</first_page>
      <last_page>480</last_page>
    </pages>
    <publisher_item>
      <item_number>723-5241-FeFeLa-2005</item_number>
    </publisher_item>
    <doi_data>
      <doi>10.wxyz/C2005V72P3p477</doi>
      <resource>
      http://www.austms.org.au/Publ/Bulletin/V72P3/723-5241-FeFeLa/</resource>
    </doi_data>
    <extra_info>
      <abstract>\par We show that, for any positive integers $n$
      and $m$, if a set $S \subset R^m$ intersects every $m-1$
      dimensional affine hyperplane in $R^m$ in exactly $n$ points,
      then $S$ is not an $F_{\sigma }$ set. This gives a natural
      extension to results of Khalid Bouhjar, Jan J. Dijkstra, and
      R. Daniel Mauldin, who have proven this result for the case
      when $m=2$, and also Jan J. Dijkstra and Jan van Mill, who
      have shown this result for the case when $n=m$.</abstract>
      <subject_class>54B05, 54H05, 54F45</subject_class>
      <acknowledgement></acknowledgement>
    </extra_info>
    <citation_list>
      <citation>
        <structured_citation>
          <author>K. Bouhjar, J.J. Dijkstra and R.D.
          Mauldin</author>
          <title type="article">No 
          <span class="MATH">
            <i>n</i>
          </span>-point set is 
          <span class="MATH">
            <i>σ</i>
          </span>-compact</title>
          <medium type="journal" volume="129" year="2001"
          pages="621--622">Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.</medium>
          <MRnumber>MR1800242</MRnumber>
        </structured_citation>
        <unstructured_citation style="LaTeX">K. Bouhjar, J.J.
        Dijkstra and R.D. Mauldin; No $n$-point set is $\sigma
        $-compact, \textit{Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.} \textbf{129}
        (2001), pp.~621--622.</unstructured_citation>
      </citation>
      <citation>
        <structured_citation>
          <author>J.J. Dijkstra and J. van Mill</author>
          <title type="article">On sets that meet every hyperplane
          in 
          <span class="MATH">
            <i>n</i>
          </span>-space in at most 
          <span class="MATH">
            <i>n</i>
          </span>points</title>
          <medium type="journal" volume="34" year="2002"
          pages="361--368">Bull. London Math. Soc.</medium>
          <MRnumber>MR1887709</MRnumber>
        </structured_citation>
        <unstructured_citation style="LaTeX">J.J. Dijkstra and J.
        van Mill; On sets that meet every hyperplane in $n$-space
        in at most $n$ points, \textit{Bull. London Math. Soc.}
        \textbf{34} (2002), pp.~361--368.</unstructured_citation>
      </citation>
      <citation>
        <structured_citation>
          <author>D.L. Fearnley, L. Fearnley and J.W.
          Lamoreaux</author>
          <title type="article">Every three-point space is zero
          dimensional</title>
          <medium type="journal" volume="131" year="2003"
          pages="2241--2245">Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.</medium>
          <MRnumber>MR1963773</MRnumber>
        </structured_citation>
        <unstructured_citation style="LaTeX">D.L. Fearnley, L.
        Fearnley and J.W. Lamoreaux; Every three-point space is
        zero dimensional, \textit{Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.}
        \textbf{131} (2003),
        pp.~2241--2245.</unstructured_citation>
      </citation>
      <citation>
        <structured_citation>
          <author>D.L. Fearnley, L. Fearnley and J.W.
          Lamoreaux</author>
          <title type="article">On the dimension of 
          <span class="MATH">
            <i>n</i>
          </span>-point sets</title>
          <medium type="journal" volume="129" year="2003"
          pages="15--18">Topology Appl.</medium>
          <MRnumber>MR1955662</MRnumber>
        </structured_citation>
        <unstructured_citation style="LaTeX">D.L. Fearnley, L.
        Fearnley and J.W. Lamoreaux; On the dimension of $n$-point
        sets, \textit{Topology Appl.} \textbf{129} (2003),
        pp.~15--18.</unstructured_citation>
      </citation>
      <citation>
        <structured_citation>
          <author>J. Kulesza</author>
          <title type="article">A two point set must be zero
          dimensional</title>
          <medium type="journal" volume="116" year="1992"
          pages="551--553">Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.</medium>
          <MRnumber>MR1093599</MRnumber>
        </structured_citation>
        <unstructured_citation style="LaTeX">J. Kulesza; A two
        point set must be zero dimensional, \textit{Proc. Amer.
        Math. Soc.} \textbf{116} (1992),
        pp.~551--553.</unstructured_citation>
      </citation>
      <citation>
        <structured_citation>
          <author>R.D. Mauldin</author>
          <title type="article" status="in book">Is there a Borel
          set M in 
          <span class="MATH">
            <i>R
            <sup>2</sup></i>
          </span>which meets each straight line in exactly two
          points?</title>
          <medium type="book" year="1990" pages="619--629">Open
          Problems in Topology</medium>
          <publisher address="Amsterdam">North-Holland</publisher>
        </structured_citation>
        <unstructured_citation style="LaTeX">R.D. Mauldin; Is there
        a Borel set M in $R^2$ which meets each straight line in
        exactly two points?, in \textit{Open Problems in Topology}
        (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990),
        pp.~619--629.</unstructured_citation>
      </citation>
      <citation>
        <structured_citation>
          <author>S. Mazurkiewicz</author>
          <title type="article">O pewnej mnogsci plaskiej, ktora ma
          z kazda prosta dwa i tylkp dwa punkty wspolne</title>
          <extra_info type="paper">(Polish)</extra_info>
          <medium type="journal" volume="7" year="1914"
          pages="382--384">C. R. Varsovie</medium>
          <extra_info>French translation: {Sur un ensemble plan qui
          a avec chaque droit deut at seulement points cummuns},
          Stefan Mazurkiewicz, in Traveaux de Topologie et ses
          Applications (PWN, Warsaw, 1969), pp. 46--47</extra_info>
        </structured_citation>
        <unstructured_citation style="LaTeX">S. Mazurkiewicz; O
        pewnej mnogsci plaskiej, ktora ma z kazda prosta dwa i
        tylkp dwa punkty wspolne, (Polish), \textit{C. R. Varsovie}
        \textbf{7} (1914), pp.~382--384. French translation: {Sur
        un ensemble plan qui a avec chaque droit deut at seulement
        points cummuns}, Stefan Mazurkiewicz, in Traveaux de
        Topologie et ses Applications (PWN, Warsaw, 1969), pp.
        46--47</unstructured_citation>
      </citation>
    </citation_list>
  </journal_article>
</journal>
